So sometimes when I am bored, or waiting around for something, or thinking about books, I read reviews of some of my favorite books on Amazon. Now, I don’t usually read the good reviews of books I’ve already read – if I like them, I already know why they are good. Instead, I like to read the bad reviews.
And it’s not like I’m going in there reading the bad reviews for a scholarly discussion in my mind. I’m not looking for valid viewpoints that are contrary to my own, or a point to make me think with a little more objectivity about the quality of the book. No, I like to read them because I am SURE the people who wrote them are incredibly stupid and it’s about the closest I can come to watching Jerry Springer or professional wrestling without cringing (much). I love reading people’s negative opinions and declaring (in my head) how wrong they are – it’s probably similar to how fashionistas look at my clothes and think how pleased they are that their clothes only have the holes that they paid extra for.
But also, I honestly think that a lot of people who write negative reviews on places like Amazon are mostly doing it for the wrong reasons. Personally, if I don’t like a book, I just don’t recommend it and don’t read any more titles by that author. Everyone has different tastes and different ideas of what makes a book good, and just because I think all Ayn Rand books are nothing but narcissistic diatribes doesn’t mean that they aren’t meaningful and valuable to a lot of narcissistic people. So who am I to go on a public website (meaning one that people besides my friends, Hi Katie! actually read) and say nasty things about a book that someone has worked their fingers to the bone on? Most of the time, negative reviews on reader generated content sites come from people with bad attitudes and too much time on their hands, in my opinion.
Let’s look at an example! I have already raved about Patrick Rothfuss‘ debut fantasy novel, The Name of the Wind. It’s a fantasy epic that’s cut from a little bit of a different cloth than most. It feels fresh, fun, sad, and both gritty and idealistic at the same time, which is quite a feat. On top of that, Pat seems like a great guy, is clearly intelligent and a wonderful speaker; he loves to connect with his fans, and he understands his fans – since he’s been a fantasy reader and a fan for most of his life.
His Amazon reviews are actually pretty amazing – in fact, there are only 2 one-star reviews compared to 173 5-star reviews. And what do these people have to say? What about the book made them hate it badly enough to actually spend the time to sit down, click their way over to Amazon, sign in, and compose something negative about something someone else has poured their heart and soul into?
The first guy seems to be mad that the book is too long. Apparently, he can’t tell how long a book is when he picks it up – I guess he thought all the pages at the end were pictures, coloring pages, or pornography. Really, I think he’s one of the people who was upset about the next book in the series being delayed a year, because he complains that he won’t remember the book by then and won’t have time to reread the 900 pages.
Wait, what? 900 pages?
The hardcover edition of this book is 662 pages long. Admittedly long, but it is, after all, a fantasy epic and I believe that the word epic has long in its definition. If I recall correctly though, the ARC, or advanced reading copy given out to booksellers and reviewers (which I read first) was around 900 pages. So, this guy didn’t even buy a copy of the book, he got an uncorrected proof for free, and then drags down Pat’s rating by complaining about its length? And, the last sentence of his review is, “Sorry bud, get an editor.”
That’s why you should read the book AFTER it’s been edited! That is so awful to me. I just don’t get it! That guy is SO STUPID! I’d be throwing chairs at him on Jerry Springer. Jerry would have a broken nose and a concussion trying to stop me. The audience would be cheering and that guy would be cowering in the corner, holding his 900-page ARC in front of his face for defense. THEN he’d appreciate it.
The sheer audacity of giving a ONE STAR review to a book that you LIKED, that you got for FREE, because it was too LONG, except you didn’t actually read the fully edited SHORTER version because likely you’d have to PAY for it, is astounding to me. It makes me really, really angry, but in that righteous anger way that almost makes you feel good about yourself.
The other one-star reviewer at least didn’t like the book. I can’t say I understand that, but it is better than liking it and giving it one star. However, the reason they didn’t like it, they said, was because there was no climax. But they said that right after they admitted that they did not finish the book. How do they know it didn’t have a climax if they didn’t finish the book, you ask? I don’t know. But it makes me angry.
I know that there are legitimate reasons for some negative reviews – if it is inappropriate for the age group it was marketed towards, if it has bad grammar, if it is truly poorly written – and I do look at reviews at times when I am considering purchasing a book. But somehow, it seems like the dregs of society have moved from the dark alleys and street corners, from the daytime talk shows and reality shows, to Amazon’s one-star review section. It seems to be a place people use to feel superior, to say to a writer, “I can affect you, I can make your day a little bit worse.”
But then, really, am I any better if I go there and point my finger and laugh, or fume and write about it on the bookstore’s blog while I’m working? Probably not, especially since I look at them in order to find things to jeer at. But I doubt I’ll stop doing it. Hey, I have to read them, ordering books is part of my job!